Boeing Aware of Battery Ills Before the Fires


Toru Hanai/Reuters


All Nippon Airways, the biggest operator of 787s, is holding jets at Haneda airport in Tokyo.







Even before two battery failures led to the grounding of all Boeing 787 jets this month, the lithium-ion batteries used on the aircraft had experienced multiple problems that raised questions about their reliability.




Officials at All Nippon Airways, the jets’ biggest operator, said in an interview on Tuesday that it had replaced 10 of the batteries in the months before fire and smoke in two cases caused regulators around the world to ground the jets.


The airline said it told Boeing of the replacements as they occurred but was not required to report them to safety regulators because no flights were canceled. National Transportation Safety Board officials said Tuesday that the battery replacements were now part of their inquiry.


The airline also, for the first time, explained the extent of the previous problems, which underscore the volatile nature of the batteries and add to concerns about whether Boeing and other plane manufacturers will be able to use the batteries safely.


In five of the 10 replacements, All Nippon said that the main battery showed an unexpectedly low charge. An unexpected drop in a 787’s main battery also occurred on the All Nippon flight that had to make an emergency landing in Japan on Jan. 16.


The airline also revealed that in three instances, the main battery failed to start normally and had to be replaced along with the charger. In other cases, one battery showed an error reading and another, used to start the auxiliary power unit, failed. All the events occurred from May to December of last year. And all the batteries were returned to their maker, GS Yuasa.


Kelly Nantel, a spokeswoman for the National Transportation Safety Board, said investigators had only recently heard that there had been “numerous issues with the use of these batteries” on 787s. She said the board had asked Boeing, All Nippon and other airlines for information about the problems.


”That will absolutely be part of investigation,” she said.


Boeing, based in Chicago, has said repeatedly that any problems with the batteries can be contained without threatening the planes and their passengers.


But in response to All Nippon’s disclosures, Boeing officials said the airline’s replacement of the batteries also suggested that safeguards to prevent dangerous overheating of the batteries might have kicked in.


Boeing officials also acknowledged that the new batteries were not lasting as long as they were meant to. But All Nippon said that the batteries it replaced had not expired.


A GS Yuasa official, Tsutomu Nishijima, said battery exchanges are part of the normal operations of a plane but would not comment further.


The Federal Aviation Administration decided in 2007 to allow Boeing to use the lithium-ion batteries instead of older, more stable types as long as it took safety measures to prevent or contain a fire. But once Boeing put in those safeguards, it did not revisit its basic design even as more evidence surfaced of the risks involved, regulators said.


In a little-noticed test in 2010, the F.A.A. found that the kind of lithium-ion chemistry that Boeing planned to use — lithium cobalt — was the most flammable of several possible types. The test found that that type of battery provided the most power, but could also overheat more quickly.


And in 2011, a lithium-ion battery on a Cessna business jet started smoking while it was being charged, prompting Cessna to switch to traditional nickel cadmium batteries.


The safety board said Tuesday that it had still not determined what caused a fire on Jan. 7 on a Japan Airlines 787 that was parked at Logan Airport in Boston. The fire occurred nine days before an All Nippon jet made its emergency landing when pilots smelled smoke in the cockpit.


Federal regulators said it was also still possible that flaws in the manufacturing process could have gone undetected and triggered the recent incidents.


The batteries’ maker X-rays each battery before shipping them to look for possible defects.


Matthew L. Wald contributed reporting.



You're reading an article about
Boeing Aware of Battery Ills Before the Fires
This article
Boeing Aware of Battery Ills Before the Fires
can be opened in url
http://newsinterpretable.blogspot.com/2013/01/boeing-aware-of-battery-ills-before.html
Boeing Aware of Battery Ills Before the Fires